Austin County rural

Mission-field Study · ministry priority: Hispanic/Latino + Black · Download filing PDF ↓

Rural county. Austin is below the 50,000 urban threshold, so a property sale here follows the general non-urban proceeds policy (¶4), not the Urban Ministry Plan — see Part 3. The demographic and feasibility reads below are still useful for district strategy.

1 · Demographic Profile of the Mission Field

Population
30,712
8 census tracts
5-yr growth
4%
+1,147 people · proj. 2%
Hispanic
27%
5,559 Spanish-speakers (5+)
Black
9%
non-Anglo total 37%
Under 18
24%
Median income
$77,369
population-weighted

Fastest-growing neighborhoods

Tracts with fewer than 1,000 residents five years ago are excluded here so a handful of new residents can't read as a four-figure growth rate.

Place5-yr growthPeople addedHispanic
Austin County (rural) 45% 919 33%
Austin County (rural) 28% 879 26%
Austin County (rural) 17% 894 30%
Austin County (rural) 12% 578 38%
Austin County (rural) -9% -332 14%

2 · Feasibility — mission, plants & ministries

1 Rio Texas North District UMC serve this county — 1 of them reach non-Anglo communities (0 Hispanic-led, 0 Anglo+Hispanic ministry, 1 Black-led).
That is roughly 1 church per 30,712 residents against a mission field that is 37% non-Anglo.
8 tracts (30,712 people) have no UMC within a 15-minute drive; the average tract is 19.2 mi from the nearest UMC.

Highest-opportunity neighborhoods

Composite of growth (35%), church-saturation gap (30%), demographic fit (20%), and density (15%), 0–100, scored across every tract in the county. ◆ marks tracts that also clear Lens A's 6-mile-from-any-UMC plant filter.

PlaceOpportunity5-yr growthPopmi to UMC
Austin County (rural) 69 17% 6,010 24.5
Austin County (rural) 65 12% 5,566 14.8
Austin County (rural) 60 28% 3,997 17.8
Austin County (rural) 60 45% 2,971 17.2
Austin County (rural) 50 -12% 2,335 15.8
Austin County (rural) 47 -17% 2,394 19.3

Existing North District UMCs in Austin

ChurchCityServes
Cherry Chapel UMCIndustry Black-led

3 · Proposed Restrictions & Priority for Proceeds

At 27% Hispanic and growing, the field warrants a strong Hispanic/Latino ministry priority alongside cross-cultural work in existing congregations. The Black population (9% of the field, +40% over five years) supports a Black-ministry priority — note the Plan's caution that the legacy footprint of historic Black UMCs does not track where the Black population is growing today.

Non-urban policy (¶4). Austin is below the urban threshold, so the Urban Ministry Plan's 75/25 split does not apply. Under the general policy for discontinued/abandoned property, proceeds are handled as below.
20% of net → Conference Trustees' Property Administration Fund (capped at $400k).
100% of the remainder (the entire post-admin balance) → North District Strategy Team for use in the district. No Conference-office share; no urban restriction is required.

The demographic profile above still argues for a Hispanic/Latino + Black ministry emphasis if the District Strategy Team chooses to direct these funds intentionally. If the property was a former Rio Grande Annual Conference congregation, the Latino/Hispanic highest-priority restriction the Plan requires still applies regardless of urban status.