Mason County rural

Mission-field Study · ministry priority: Black · Download filing PDF ↓

Rural county. Mason is below the 50,000 urban threshold, so a property sale here follows the general non-urban proceeds policy (¶4), not the Urban Ministry Plan — see Part 3. The demographic and feasibility reads below are still useful for district strategy.

1 · Demographic Profile of the Mission Field

Population
3,951
2 census tracts
5-yr growth
-5%
+-210 people · proj. -1%
Hispanic
21%
600 Spanish-speakers (5+)
Black
0%
non-Anglo total 21%
Under 18
23%
Median income
$69,706
population-weighted

Fastest-growing neighborhoods

Tracts with fewer than 1,000 residents five years ago are excluded here so a handful of new residents can't read as a four-figure growth rate.

Place5-yr growthPeople addedHispanic
Mason 6% 140 33%
Mason County (rural) -18% -350 4%

2 · Feasibility — mission, plants & ministries

2 Rio Texas North District UMCs serve this county — 0 of them reach non-Anglo communities (0 Hispanic-led, 0 Anglo+Hispanic ministry, 0 Black-led).
That is roughly 1 church per 1,976 residents against a mission field that is 21% non-Anglo.
0 tracts (0 people) have no UMC within a 15-minute drive; the average tract is 1.0 mi from the nearest UMC.
Representation gap. The mission field is 21% non-Anglo, yet none of the 2 North District UMCs here is positioned to reach Hispanic or Black communities. The Plan is explicit that this gap does not lessen the larger Church's responsibility to bring the gospel to the people who live here — it sharpens it.

Highest-opportunity neighborhoods

Composite of growth (35%), church-saturation gap (30%), demographic fit (20%), and density (15%), 0–100, scored across every tract in the county. ◆ marks tracts that also clear Lens A's 6-mile-from-any-UMC plant filter.

PlaceOpportunity5-yr growthPopmi to UMC
Mason 56 6% 2,349 0.1
Mason County (rural) 37 -18% 1,602 1.8

Existing North District UMCs in Mason

ChurchCityServes
Hilda UMCHilda Anglo
First UMCMason Anglo

3 · Proposed Restrictions & Priority for Proceeds

The Black population (0% of the field, +200% over five years) supports a Black-ministry priority — note the Plan's caution that the legacy footprint of historic Black UMCs does not track where the Black population is growing today.

Non-urban policy (¶4). Mason is below the urban threshold, so the Urban Ministry Plan's 75/25 split does not apply. Under the general policy for discontinued/abandoned property, proceeds are handled as below.
20% of net → Conference Trustees' Property Administration Fund (capped at $400k).
100% of the remainder (the entire post-admin balance) → North District Strategy Team for use in the district. No Conference-office share; no urban restriction is required.

The demographic profile above still argues for a Black ministry emphasis if the District Strategy Team chooses to direct these funds intentionally. If the property was a former Rio Grande Annual Conference congregation, the Latino/Hispanic highest-priority restriction the Plan requires still applies regardless of urban status.